CISH 2026
User Dashboard/Login
Skip to content

Italian Medieval Studies Between Tradition and Innovation

  • Date

    VI. Friday, 28.08.2026, 11:00-13:00/30

  • Location
    House 3 - SR 224
  • Theme
    C - National and Regional Schools of Historiography

Abstract

In the hundred years since the foundation of the CISH, Italian medievalism has experienced a progressive internationalisation. While during Fascism a ‘nationalist’ view of the Middle Ages, understood according to Gioacchino Volpe as a trait d'union between ancient Rome and the Renaissance, had asserted itself, in the post-World War II period Raffaello Morghen's ‘Christian Middle Ages’ provided a new generation of Italian historians with the possibility of rereading the history of the medieval Church beyond any apologetic intentions and projecting it into the broader field of political, socio-economic and social history and mentalities, in constant dialogue with German and French historiography. This process of internationalisation also involved the history of the forms of power of the so-called feudal age and the communal phase, which was renewed in the light of social and economic perspectives, thanks to which the categories of interpretation were considerably refined, overcoming the Risorgimento conception of the Commune as the ‘seedbed of the Italian nation’ and as a democratic experience opposed to the seigniories and principalities of the late Middle Ages, to the benefit of an interpretation of these forms of power in the broader framework of similar institutional experiences that flourished in the medieval West. At the same time, a debate developed on the alleged exceptionality of the Italian case with regard to both the communes and the dawn of capitalism. These processes of ‘denationalisation’ of mediaeval historiography were accompanied by a remarkable flourishing of local history studies, based on precise investigations carried out on often unpublished archive sources, which greatly enriched the available data base, but at the same time provoked a sometimes excessive fragmentation of historiographic objects and a tendency towards atheoreticity, denounced by Ovidio Capitani in the 1970s. In this millennium, the redefinition of the relations between history and social sciences by French historiography, followed by German and Anglo-Saxon historiography, and the consequent preponderant weight assigned to the historiographical problematic with respect to precise ascertainment and a purely philological approach have led to a certain marginalisation of large sectors of Italian medievalism, accused of settling on late-positivist positions. The panel starts from the awareness that only the rigour of the historical-critical method can consider the intrinsic complexities and multi-perspectivity of historical developments and offer common and shared ground for discussion between historiographies, removing them from an excessively evaluative dimension that increases the risk of a political use of history.

Convenor

  • Umberto Longo   (Sapienza-Università di Roma, Istituto storico italiano per il medioevo)

Panelists

  • Umberto Longo   (Sapienza-Università di Roma, Istituto storico italiano per il medioevo)
  • Nicolangelo D’Acunto (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano, Istituto storico italiano per il medioevo)
  • Franco Franceschi (Università di Siena)
  • Daniela Rando (Università di Pavia, Istituto storico italiano per il medioevo)
  • Andrea Zorzi ()

Papers

  • Italian research institutions on the Middle Ages in the last hundred years

    Umberto Longo
  • From the “Medioevo Cristiano” to the plurality of Christianities

    Nicolangelo D'Acunto
  • The Debate on the Exceptionalism of Medieval Italian Capitalism

    Franco Franceschi
  • Italian and European medievalism between nationalistic closures and global history

    Daniela Rando
  • The Study of Medieval Forms of Power between Nationalisation and Internationalisation

    Andrea Zorzi